Is peer review the enemy of creativity?

February 5, 2009 at 5:24 pm Leave a comment

The anonymous peer review process is the enemy of scientific creativity, according to Sir James Black in an interview for an FT article (2nd February).

The article went on to quote Sir James as saying: “Peer reviewers go for orthodoxy… Many of the great 19th-century discoveries were made by men who had independent wealth – Charles Darwin is the prototype. They trusted themselves.”

Mmm…I wonder if this will this lead to the abandonment of publication planning activities?

Sir James Black discovered the beta blocker propranolol for the treatment of angina and the histamine H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine for the treatment of stomach ulcers. He won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1988 and you can read his autobiography here.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Medical writing, Medicine, Pharmaceutical, Science writing.

UPDATED: Hot off the press from the Royal College of Physicians A look at (free) medical and scientific search tools

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

Delicious

Previously on Medical Communicating…

Categories


%d bloggers like this: